护生满意度量表的汉化及信效度检验
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士,助教

通讯作者:

基金项目:

2025年度江苏省教育科学规划课题(B/2025/01/114);江苏省高等教育教改研究课题(2025JGYB140)


Adaptation and psychometric testing of the Nursing Student Satisfaction Scale
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 对护生满意度量表(Nursing Student Satisfaction Scale,NSSS)进行汉化,并检验其在我国护生中的信效度。方法 经原量表作者授权后,依据Brislin模型进行正译、回译及跨文化调适,通过预调查形成中文版量表。采用便利抽样法选取镇江市2所高校547名护理专业在校生作为调查对象,验证量表的信效度。结果 中文版护生满意度量表包含28个条目,包括专业社交互动(8条)、课程和教学(13条)、环境(7条)3 个维度。条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI )为0.875~1.000,量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.940;探索性因子分析提取3个公因子,累计方差贡献率为71.311%;验证性因子分析显示一阶三因子模型拟合良好(χ2/df=2.856,RMSEA=0.057,GFI=0.869、CFI=0.930、NFI=0.988、TLI=0.912);量表整体Cronbach′s α系数为 0.944,折半信度0.862,重测信度0.917。结论 中文版护生满意度量表具有良好的信度与效度,适用于我国在校护生的满意度评估。

    Abstract:

    Objective To adapt the Nursing Student Satisfaction Scale (NSSS) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity among nursing students in China. Methods After obtaining authorization from the original scale developer, the scale was translated, back-translated, and cross-culturally adapted based on the Brislin model. A pre-survey was conducted to form the Chinese version of NSSS. A total of 547 nursing students from 2 universities in Zhenjiang were selected as participants using convenience sampling to verify the scale′s reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of NSSS consisted of 28 items, covering three dimensions: professional social interaction (8 items), curriculum and teaching (13 items), and environment (7 items). The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.875 to 1.000, and the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.940. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) extracted 3 common factors, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 71.311%. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the first-order three-factor model fitted well (χ2/df=2.856, RMSEA=0.057, GFI=0.869, CFI=0.930, NFI=0.988, TLI=0.912). The overall Cronbach′s α coefficient of the scale was 0.944, the split-half reliability was 0.862, and the test-retest reliability was 0.917. Conclusion The Chinese version of NSSS has good reliability and validity, and it is suitable for evaluating the satisfaction of nursing students in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴凡,杨超,张伟.护生满意度量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2026,41(10):77-81

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-29
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-03
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-15