护理临床决策支持系统评价指标的范围综述
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

女,硕士在读,学生

通讯作者:

基金项目:

华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院科研基金护理专项重点项目(2023C03)


Scoping review of evaluation indicators for nursing clinical decision support systems
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 对护理临床决策支持系统评价指标相关文献进行范围综述,为构建科学、规范且本土化的评价指标体系提供参考。方法 以范围综述方法学为指导,聚焦护理临床决策支持系统评价指标,系统检索国内外数据库。检索时限为建库至2025年4月1日。结果 护理临床决策支持系统评价指标可归为护理人员、患者、系统技术3个一级指标,24个二级指标。各级指标累计出现512次,其中护理人员相关指标208次(40.62%),患者相关指标126次(24.61%),技术层面相关指标178次(34.77%)。国内出现频次排名前5的二级指标为护理质量结果、患者结局、护理质量过程、护理工作量和决策效果;国外出现频次排名前5的二级指标为警报设置拟合度、决策效果、护理质量结果、患者结局和算法成熟度。结论 护理临床决策支持系统评价指标聚焦于护理人员、患者、系统技术三大核心方面,国内外评价指标的侧重点存在差异。建议今后的研究应遵循国际疾病指南,衡量各项指标权重,并促使各地医疗机构采用统一标准的评估工具,以提升护理临床决策支持系统评价的准确性和有效性。

    Abstract:

    Objective To conduct a scoping review of literature related to evaluation indicators for nursing clinical decision support systems (CDSS), providing a reference for constructing a scientific, standardized, and localized evaluation indicator system. Methods Guided by the scoping review methodology and focusing on nursing CDSS evaluation indicators, a systematic search was conducted across domestic and international databases. The search period spanned from the inception of the databases to April 1, 2025. Results The evaluation indicators for nursing CDSS were categorized into three primary indicators:nursing staff, patients, and system technology, encompassing 24 secondary indicators. These indicators appeared a total of 512 times, with nursing staff-related indicators appearing 208 times (40.62%), patient-related indicators 126 times (24.61%), and technical-level indicators 178 times (34.77%). In China, the top five secondary indicators by frequency were nursing quality outcomes, patient outcomes, nursing quality processes, nursing workload, and decision effectiveness. Internationally, the top five secondary indicators were alert clinical relevance (fit), decision effectiveness, nursing quality outcomes, patient outcomes, and algorithm maturity. Conclusion Evaluation indicators for nursing CDSS focus on three core dimensions:nursing staff, patients, and system technology, with differing emphases between domestic and international research. Future studies should follow international clinical guidelines, determine the weights of various indicators, and encourage medical institutions to adopt unified standard assessment tools to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of CDSS evaluations.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈亚男,崔怡爽,张诗怡,何细飞,李宗阳,周淼,金晓露,娄雪娇.护理临床决策支持系统评价指标的范围综述[J].护理学杂志,2026,41(10):116-123

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-05
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-26
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-15